Inside: SereneScreen Fan Forum

Inside: SereneScreen Fan Forum (https://www.feldoncentral.com/forums/index.php)
-   Marine Aquarium 2 for Windows Archive (https://www.feldoncentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Marine Aquarium 3 Rumors and Speculation (https://www.feldoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3675)

Tiny Turtle 02-16-2007 08:43 AM

Far north? You guys really want to throw that gauntlet? :)

/Tiny 59

cjmaddy 02-16-2007 09:08 AM

It's not exactly tropical here! - But there's an outside chance of the fish surviving.
... As for Scotland, (or Sweden! ;) ), you might as well stick 'em all in the freezer! :D

Jim Sachs 02-16-2007 09:26 AM

I'm happy to say that the Sea Fan is more or less under control now. It was very difficult eliminating the "buzz", or moire patterns in something with thousands of tiny holes in it. You would think that high-res textures would be the answer to everything, but not at all. Sometime the very blurriness of a low-res texture hides a multitude of sins.

Jav400 02-16-2007 10:03 AM

Just to settle some curiosity. What you see now in the aquarium is pretty much the right side of the new tank. There are some changes and additions, but its probably 80% the same. The large pc. on the left in the current tank is even larger with a cave in it, and some other extras added in. Farther on to the left is a deeper area with more ground/shell in the front for movement, and several lines of smaller corals in the back. It looks very well balanced and should give more room for swimming, and much more additional room for the creatures that will be added later. There are more greens and colors, and it has more clams etc. that should show movement.

One question I have Jim is will the clams actually be able to move? ( I mean change position/placement in the tank, not only open and close ). I had some scallops in my old home tank and they moved by clacking their shells together and squirting water out of the back. It was kind of a squirt/jerk/jump/ float back down movement, but they did move. I eventually got rid of them because the down side to this was that when this happened they stirred up dust/shell from the bottom of the tank and it looked like a london fog in that area until it settled again.

cjmaddy 02-16-2007 11:58 AM

Can you give some indication of how display on dual monitors will be implemented? - Will we see approx 2/3 of the new, nearly two widescreens wide background, displayed across our two 5x4 monitors? - Or will we still have only a clone on the second monitor, - as in the present MA?
I'm not referring to horizontally spanning an image across two monitors. I'm referring more to the way that Dream Aquarium is intended to cope with two screens. .... But I don't see how that can be achieved from one 32:9 image. It seems to me that it will have to be viewed in horizontal span mode. - And that will be a great pity, as that would mean having to have everything in span mode, (which would not be good!). Or the alternative, which would be to switch to span as and when required, - and that would be even worse!

feldon34 02-16-2007 12:37 PM

I would imagine that there will no "cloning" and that both spanned and independent display devices will be able to take advantage of showing the background. Otherwise what's the point? :)

Dream Aquarium flip-flops the background on the second monitor.

Marine Aquarium 3 actually has a continuous background which is nearly 3 times as wide as a normal monitor, of which just part of it will be seen on 1 or even 2 monitors. Conceivably on 3 monitors, if you have a powerful enough video card, you would see the entire background and get black bars at the left of monitor #1 and the right of monitor #3.

ESHIREY 02-16-2007 01:32 PM

That's great. I can't wait to see this. I too would like to be a tester when the time comes.

drfish 02-16-2007 01:35 PM

I can't believe all this talk about the new aquarium, what do you guys think this place is, a fan site? :rolleyes:

This is so cool. :D

cjmaddy 02-16-2007 01:55 PM

Yes, we should remember now shouldn't we, that this is now a gaming forum! ;)

Jav400 02-16-2007 01:58 PM

and evidentally a photography forum for some. ;) :D

cjmaddy 02-16-2007 02:02 PM

...... but sadly, a very poor second! :(

Jim Sachs 02-16-2007 02:27 PM

Regarding what you would see on two monitors -- I'm not sure what more I can do about it. The scene is roughly two widescreens wide, so if you were using two widescreen monitors side-by-side, there would be very little overlap in the middle. I can't say there would be NO overlap, because of the way 3D works. Items in the foreground wouldn't overlap at all, but some items in the distance would be visible on the right edge of the left monitor and the left edge of the right monitor. It's not feasible to add any more width; each additional screen would take about 1.5 years.

For single-monitor users (the vast majority), the scene can either scroll slowly from side to side or the arrow keys can be used to scroll manually to any desired view.

cjmaddy 02-16-2007 06:02 PM

My understanding, from Alan's descriptions of his future intentions, and of what is 'doable'. Is that in the next DA dual monitor setup, the second monitor's background will be a continuation of the first, (with an adjustable allowance capable of being made for the screens' surround's widths). This to me sounds amazing! - If this is so, then I assume that fish moving from one half to the other, will first 'disappear' behind the monitor's surrounds! - before reappearing on the other screen! .... Amazing!!! - Single-monitor set-ups will be able to have either half as their single-monitor background.

I was hoping that something vaguely like this might be possible with the new MA 3.0. However, at fist I thought that horizontal-span mode would be the only way to achieve a spread across two monitors, and to allow the fish to move from one to the other. But from Jim's comments, it appears that an alternative way to use two monitors could be to display a left of centre portion on the left screen, and scroll to a right of centre portion on the right screen. (Assuming that the whole could be cloned on the second monitor, ala MA2.6). - Unfortunately this would not allow fish to be seen passing from one to the other. - But it could work for the background, and give the impression of a very large tank! (... And without the need to change to horizontal-span. - Which requires a re-boot! - And other re-adjustments!)

..... Will this be possible?

Simple Steve 02-16-2007 06:08 PM

I would not like to be a beta tester. With due respect to Jim, hosing my system as a tester for someone, is something I would not care to do again.

I have a question though. Is Jim going to add any elements that make the water effect look more real? That's the biggest complaint I have between real aquariums and virtual ones. The fish never quite look like they're moving through water.

Socrates 02-16-2007 07:17 PM

None of Jim's or other Prolific betas have ever hosed my system. They don't make system changes. The betas may occasionally crash or look funny or whatever, but I don't recall any system hosing.

Jim Sachs 02-16-2007 09:55 PM

Cliff - This is the way I see it happening (I haven't actually programmed any of this yet): There exists in 3D a very wide tank with fish and other critters playing in every part of it. If there are two monitors, each is fed by its own "camera" into this environment. The two cameras are totally independant, and there would be some way of telling the arrow keys which one to move (maybe shift-arrow would scroll the right screen). When you get it set up so that your two monitors look like one big tank with a bezel dividing them, save it that way.

Steve - If you mean the lightplay, then yes, it is one of the things I'm changing. I can't go into too much detail, because it's an area that MA has always enjoyed a clear advantage, but one difference is that each 3D object has its own lightplay. Before, there was a 2D background and "pretend" 3D shapes hanging in front of it, just for the lightplay. Getting these lined up perectly with the objects in the picture was nearly impossible.

But if you are talking about haze or junk floating in the water, then no I won't be including anything like that. The goal of any aquarium keeper is well-filtered, crystal-clear water.

cjmaddy 02-17-2007 05:13 AM

Thanks, Jim. - That sounds good! - I'm looking forward to trying it. Good luck with the programming!

feldon34 02-17-2007 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simple Steve
I would not like to be a beta tester. With due respect to Jim, hosing my system as a tester for someone, is something I would not care to do again.

While I respect what you are saying, you should know that the very first "beta" test version of Jim's Aquarium back in 2000, was more stable than most of Microsoft's final release software. As a beta, alpha, heck, "bleeding edge preview" tester for Jim's Aquarium, I have tried over 100 different versions of the software. Not one "hosed" my computer.

chimmy 02-19-2007 10:27 AM

Beta testing
 
I know this is my first post, but I'll throw my hat in for any beta testing work. I am a software tester by profession for over 7 years. I run beta or even alpha software all the time. I have no problem with crashes, hangs, etc. I'm on WinXP x64 with a 1920x1200 screen. Feel free to shoot me a mail or PM if you have any questions :)

Thanks,

Jim

ESHIREY 02-23-2007 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feldon30
While I respect what you are saying, you should know that the very first "beta" test version of Jim's Aquarium back in 2000, was more stable than most of Microsoft's final release software. As a beta, alpha, heck, "bleeding edge preview" tester for Jim's Aquarium, I have tried over 100 different versions of the software. Not one "hosed" my computer.

The same with me.

Yodelking 02-23-2007 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Sachs
3.0 will probably be released with the 2.0 fish, then upgraded as I complete each fish in the new format.

This sounds really nice. Will be great to see the new background and then get new versions and see the difference for every fish that is updated.
Will be like christmas for every updated fish we get. :)

I read that 50% of the background is done. What does that mean?
Are 50% of the objects done only or are the programming done for those objects so you have a half finished moving tank?

Jav400 02-23-2007 03:54 PM

If I remember correctly Jim told me that he has 50% of the background objects done, maybe slightly more now. But in addition I think he has the camera panning working as well.

Wizwad 02-23-2007 04:03 PM

So there's a chance it might be done by October, then? :D

Jim Sachs 02-23-2007 04:51 PM

Jav has it right - about 50% of the objects are in the tank, many just hanging in space with no connective material. The camera is panning back and forth through the whole width. The resolution is far better than before, and people running it on a 1920x1280 monitor (or HDTV Plasma) shouldn't be disappointed.

Mark - there's at least a 1-in-12 chance that it will be done by some October.

Tiny Turtle 02-23-2007 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Sachs
. . . The resolution is far better than before, and people running it on a 1920x1280 monitor (or HDTV Plasma) shouldn't be disappointed. . .

Nobody's doubting that... :)

Shinsa 02-23-2007 11:38 PM

back from the depths...
 
[After awakening from his coma, Shinsa finds a brave new world to explore. Not to mention, seeing a few familiar faces!]

...I had this dream, and you were all there! Morgan, you were a Tin-man... Jav, you were a lion, and Patscarr, you were a scarecrow! And Jim, of course! You were the man behind the curtain, helping everyone!

OK, so thats pretty weird. Anyway, hello to everyone I knew before, in no particular order Jim, Morgan, Jav, Pat, TT and cjmaddy, and everyone I can't remember, and all you newbies that are now old timers. Its been a while. Just look at the forums log in message.

Welcome back, Shinsa
The time is now 09:36 PM.
You last visited: 03-12-2006 at 03:39 PM
11230 new posts in 517 topics since your last visit! (View New Posts)

You have no unread messages

Wow, gotta lot to catch up on. But whats this, no unread messages. :sad:

Yeah :nag: , I know the system deactivated my account.

Anyway, good to be back, and good to see a new, big, aqurium nearing release I can't wait!

jleslie 02-24-2007 03:23 AM

Of course this would be better news if my 1920x1200 monitor didn't walk out the window at 12:35 am on Monday... (This is at work.) Apparently it was a trade for some muddy footprints, I think I lost out there...
:-(
John

patscarr 02-24-2007 03:24 AM

Great to have you back Shinsa!

ESHIREY 02-24-2007 01:25 PM

Yes, Welcome back.

Tiny Turtle 02-25-2007 05:19 PM

Look! It's the tiny green lizard! Long time no see...

sharklover 02-27-2007 12:21 AM

Will 3.0 have the quartz clock in it?

Jim Sachs 02-27-2007 12:34 AM

Yeah, I guess I'll have to find a place for it.

ESHIREY 02-27-2007 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharklover
Will 3.0 have the quartz clock in it?

And if it does I'm sure if you don't want it you'll be able to turn it off like you can now. Am I right on this Jim?

feldon34 02-27-2007 03:35 PM

Considering that hint of reluctance I sense from "Yeah, I guess I'll have to find a place for it.", I'm pretty sure the Quartz will be optional. ;)

Jim Sachs 02-27-2007 06:36 PM

Ha, ha - Right you are.

sharklover 02-27-2007 11:23 PM

Thanks that will be nice to have that option to cut it on or off.I was going to upgrade to 2.6 after seeing the demo but I'll just wait till 3.0 comes out.I'm looking foward to getting it.

Jim Sachs 02-28-2007 01:14 AM

It could be quite a wait - the night is not going well.

feldon34 02-28-2007 08:24 AM

I hope you've got backups on memory sticks all over the house. ;)

drfish 02-28-2007 09:09 AM

Backups carved into clay tablets couldn't hurt either... :D

feldon34 02-28-2007 09:48 AM

http://www.buffalotech.com/products/...n/terastation/

The 2 TB model is now available for about $1,000 online.

It can be operated RAID5 meaning you have 1.5TB of usable storage and the other .5TB is used for striping and mirroring. If one of the 4 hard drives fails, the other 3 are used to reconstruct all the data. You can immediately start using the drive, but data from that "dead" hard drive will be slower to access as it is reconstructing.

And it's 1000Mbs (gigabit) Ethernet, so you can put it in a separate room from your computers.

I intend to get one soon, so all of my data is stored externally from my computer, so if my computer crashes, it has minimal impact.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.