If Resolution is maxed, will that mean there is no Panning??

sca · 07-19-2009, 12:38 PM

Hi Jim,

Upgraded to the Win7 RC - I have two screens running in 1680 X 1080 and 1950 X 1080,...or something close to that....one screen is wider that the other, so this is the max resolution for each.

The program is NOT panning, even though it is set to do so in the settings...changed the "rate" of pan, and this did not do anything. Could this be because at this resolution, ....everything is showing?? and there is no where to pan??

feldon34 · 07-19-2009, 12:48 PM

3630 x 1080 does sound about the same ratio as the full width of Marine Aquarium 3.

Rick Simon · 07-19-2009, 12:50 PM

Originally posted by feldon33:

3630 x 1080 does sound about the same ratio as the full width of Marine Aquarium 3.

I'm running 4240x1050 across 3 monitors and I still get a slight amount of panning. I'd estimate no more than 10-20 pixels at most, but it is still noticeable if you look closely.

feldon34 · 07-20-2009, 06:59 AM

Interesting. Alas I do not have that width to check out myself. Nor, I think does Jim.

cjmaddy · 07-20-2009, 08:34 AM

I'm running 2560x1024 across two 5x4 monitors, (@1280x1024 each). - The largest window that does not pan is approx 2560x800.

Therefore by my calculation the MA3 full width ratio is approx 16x5. - Or maybe nearer to 16x4.96875... if you want to split hairs!

Marian Nichols · 07-20-2009, 06:20 PM

Sure, why not? Let's split hairs, sounds entertaining!!

07-19-2009, 12:38 PM	#1
sca Registered Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 28	If Resolution is maxed, will that mean there is no Panning?? Hi Jim, Upgraded to the Win7 RC - I have two screens running in 1680 X 1080 and 1950 X 1080,...or something close to that....one screen is wider that the other, so this is the max resolution for each. The program is NOT panning, even though it is set to do so in the settings...changed the "rate" of pan, and this did not do anything. Could this be because at this resolution, ....everything is showing?? and there is no where to pan??

07-19-2009, 12:48 PM	#2
feldon34 Forum Administrator Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 10,939	3630 x 1080 does sound about the same ratio as the full width of Marine Aquarium 3. "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman

07-20-2009, 06:59 AM	#4
feldon34 Forum Administrator Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 10,939	Interesting. Alas I do not have that width to check out myself. Nor, I think does Jim. "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman

07-20-2009, 06:20 PM	#6
Marian Nichols ~Author~ Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Rocky Mount, NC Posts: 7,429	Sure, why not? Let's split hairs, sounds entertaining!! Write paranormal mysteries. Six books so far.

07-19-2009, 12:50 PM	#3
Rick Simon Registered Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Michigan Posts: 93	Originally posted by feldon33: 3630 x 1080 does sound about the same ratio as the full width of Marine Aquarium 3. I'm running 4240x1050 across 3 monitors and I still get a slight amount of panning. I'd estimate no more than 10-20 pixels at most, but it is still noticeable if you look closely.

07-20-2009, 08:34 AM	#5
cjmaddy Registered Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Lancashire, UK Posts: 7,854	I'm running 2560x1024 across two 5x4 monitors, (@1280x1024 each). - The largest window that does not pan is approx 2560x800. Therefore by my calculation the MA3 full width ratio is approx 16x5. - Or maybe nearer to 16x4.96875... if you want to split hairs!