Home | Register | Arcade | Gallery | Chatroom | Members | Today's Posts | Search | Log In |
|
Notices |
|
Thread Tools |
08-17-2004, 09:01 AM | #1 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
|
MD version (capabilities)
Am I misunderstanding or misconfigured, I assumed
the MD versions would allow the screen saver to span across the displays like 1 big virtual monitor swimming from screen to screen. I can only seem to make it duplicate itself on the other screens. Is that all it does or do I not have something set correct? Using 2 Geforce Fx5200 cards w/latest official driver (61.17). Connecting a crt and 3 identical flat panels. Thanks much.. P.S. Just to mention the Xp savers like Marquee, Mystify etc.. are working correct across all monitors. |
08-17-2004, 09:06 AM | #2 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
Sorry, but no that is "all" it does. The "Multi" moniker stems from the fact that it can be used on both a 4:3 and a 16:9 display. Try the search function here and I'm sure you can find some of the previous threads with the same inquiry.
/Tiny Parade-rainer Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
08-17-2004, 09:33 AM | #3 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
|
That definitely stinks..
Thanks for the prompt reply... I did try searching first.(one of these days vbulletins multi word search will make sense) Is this something being considered or could expect to see? |
08-17-2004, 09:36 AM | #4 |
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 10,939
|
I'm sorry if you think it "stinks" but there are 2 versions of the artwork. One that is 1024 x 768 which is the right size for a 4:3 monitor, and one that is 1280 x 768 which is the right size for a 16:9 monitor. Forcing one of these to fit over 2 monitors (2048 x 768) would look quite ugly.
At some point in the future, there will be a set of artwork that will work over 2 monitors.
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman |
08-17-2004, 11:05 AM | #5 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
|
Guess I kind of forgot about the background and
it being a static image. Two would be nice.. of course 4 would be better but understand that current design makes the whole on the fly scalability kind of impossible short of looking anywhere from odd to ugly. |
08-18-2004, 06:58 AM | #6 |
Pet Shark
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Back in Buffalo
Posts: 5,455
|
Originally posted by feldon28 When? lol! Please don't answer that! It was only meant as a joke.
At some point in the future, there will be a set of artwork that will work over 2 monitors.
Patrick
|
|
|
|