03-20-2006, 04:14 PM | #21 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
There is no estimated date. No version of MA has had one. There is currently no beta testing being done on it as 3.0 hasn't reached beta status yet.
/Tiny When It's Done Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
03-31-2006, 10:47 PM | #22 |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Originally posted by CountryDevil:
What is the estamated date the v3.0 will be out? Are there any beta testing programs?
|
04-12-2006, 11:37 AM | #23 |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 238
|
I just recently upgraded to a dual monitor setup, and I have it configured to 'extend desktop' to the 2nd monitor. I wanted to test MA2 with this setup - and found the following problem. I opened MA2 in window mode. Of course, it runs great as long as you keep it on one monitor. However, if you drag the MA2 window so that a portion appears on each monitor - MA2 slows down so bad that it looks like a slideshow.
|
04-12-2006, 11:48 AM | #24 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Long time no see, SunKing. - Welcome back! ...... Dual monitors? - Try DreamAquarium.
|
04-13-2006, 11:08 AM | #25 |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 238
|
Thanks for the recommendation - I will certainly check out Dream Aquarium. Yeah, it has been a while since I've posted here - but I still drop by occasionally to check in on y'all.
|
04-13-2006, 11:14 AM | #26 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 9,725
|
Glad to know you are still around SK.
Michael
Administrator of Inside:SereneScreen Aquarium Forum, Chatroom, Fan Site & Gallery DVD Collection |
04-13-2006, 11:17 AM | #27 |
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 10,939
|
SunKing, don't forget to check out the Garden thread, 'specially if you like tomatoes. I may be up to my eyeballs in 'maters a month from now.
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman |
04-13-2006, 11:44 AM | #28 |
Smilie Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 4,725
|
Glad to see you stopped by. Hope to see more of you.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
|
04-18-2006, 01:17 PM | #29 |
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 18
|
disproportionately yours...
I have an nVidia FX1300 running two 19-inch Dell monitors in span mode. I use a setting of 2560x1024 x 32.
I've been running MA2MD for some time. I just purchased the upgrade to 2.6. I'm trying to fiddle the settings to make the background fill the spanned monitors. Either I can have it span fully, but the fish are distorted horizontally, or I can have the fish roughly proportional but the aquarium straddles the middle of the two monitors leaving wide black bands at the outer extremities. I've had no luck with "Use Widescreen" on or off and a range of anamorphic settings. Is there a way to have a full span, and have the background extend above and below the viewing area, to keep the fish in proper aspect ratio? I'm not suggesting that I had it before. I'm just asking if there's a way. I prefer clipping the top and bottom of a properly proportioned tank if I can get the picture to fully use the left-right acreage of my spanned monitors. Thanks, Kevin (using mostly DreamAquarium these days) |
04-18-2006, 02:37 PM | #30 |
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 10,939
|
Originally posted by Inspector Dryfish:
I'm trying to fiddle the settings to make the background fill the spanned monitors. Either I can have it span fully, but the fish are distorted horizontally, or I can have the fish roughly proportional but the aquarium straddles the middle of the two monitors leaving wide black bands at the outer extremities. I've had no luck with "Use Widescreen" on or off and a range of anamorphic settings.
If you turn on Widescreen and then set the Anamorphic value to 1.0, then you'll be stretching a 16:9 (1280 x 768) background to a better-looking 22.5:9 (2560 x 1024). Unfortunately, the fish are squished/stretched along with the background. I wish there was some logic to allow the fish to stay the correct size when the background is off-ratio, but this would require additional programming. If you turn off spanning, then you'll have two instances of the 4:3 Aquarium, one on each monitor.
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman |
04-18-2006, 04:56 PM | #31 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Originally posted by Inspector Dryfish:
... Is there a way to have a full span, and have the background extend above and below the viewing area, to keep the fish in proper aspect ratio?
... I'm just asking if there's a way. I prefer clipping the top and bottom of a properly proportioned tank if I can get the picture to fully use the left-right acreage of my spanned monitors. Thanks, Kevin (using mostly DreamAquarium these days) Here is a screen shot of the two-screen-wide DA, in span mode, (ie. cropped top and bottom, but correct proportions). |
04-18-2006, 05:24 PM | #32 |
Smilie Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 4,725
|
And I took a picture of my monitors showing just what you posted.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
|
04-19-2006, 12:27 AM | #33 |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East of France (Europe)
Posts: 3
|
A very crazy (and rich) guy made "twelve 30-inch flatscreens mounted" !
http://gadgets.qj.net/Wall-O-Monitor...g/49/aid/21281 See below 2 sets of 4 x 30" Dell LCD with Aquarium : |
04-19-2006, 10:25 AM | #34 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
Yeah, we discussed that one elsewhere on the forum. Consensus was he would've been less crazy and have more money left had he chosen a projector instead.
Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
04-19-2006, 11:44 AM | #35 |
Prolific/SereneScreen Developer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 513
|
The projector will not give you the same pixel resolution.
|
04-19-2006, 03:23 PM | #36 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
And so we take it one more time...
Neither does the textures of the fish. Heck, we hear quite a lot of complaints about the resolution of the background not looking good above 1280x1024 - what are the odds of it for some reasong looking better at ten times that? Besides, that's a wall of monitors. It's not like someone's going to be sitting two feet away from it so I'm sure the resolution of the projector would be fine. /Tiny Projector P.S. if he had used a projector he could've covered the entire wall with just one installment of the aquarium instead of having to use multiple computers for several ones. Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
04-19-2006, 03:28 PM | #37 |
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 10,939
|
Most projectors of a reasonable price range stop at 1280 x 1024.
He's running the Aquarium in two separate instances, so a total beneficial resolution of 1280 x 768 x 2 or 1280 x 1536. Plus he has 4 independant screens running on the left, each at probably 1024 x 768. The minimum operating resolution of those 16 monitors to match the resolution he's demonstrating in that picture is 4096 x 3072. Can you tell me again how a 1280 x 1024 projector is going to come even close? By my calculations, the text in those four stacked screens on the left is going to be completely unreadable if the resolution available to each screen is 320 x 256 (1/16th of 1280 x 1024). Maybe he wants 2 instances of the Aquarium?
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman |
04-19-2006, 04:56 PM | #38 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
Que?
Take another look at that post, Morg. That wall features 12 30" 2560x1600 Dell monitors, each one costing $2,200 totaling $26,400(!) (not counting the multiple computers he's using). I'd say that kind of money buys a pretty nice projector and even leaves enough to spare for some extra lamps... The resolution should theorethically be 7680x6400, but since he can't power that from a single computer he's using multiple ones. Those 2x2 aquariums aren't windowed - they are fullscreen on two separate computers. He doesn't want two instances, he just can't show a single one... Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
04-19-2006, 05:18 PM | #39 |
Prolific/SereneScreen Developer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 513
|
I don't think that system is used only for the Aquarium. If it was then yes it was wasted. But if you need the resolution then that is the way to go.
|
04-19-2006, 06:05 PM | #40 |
is pleased
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 7,365
|
What do you need a resolution like 7680x6400 for? Especially when you can't use it as a single screen.
Thanks to Morgan, Tiny Snapshots is up and running again with "Tiny Järvafält" as the latest addition – Go have a look and tell me what you think.
"We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." /Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the first thermonuclear detonation in history. |
|
|
|