01-29-2009, 04:45 PM | #101 |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 62
|
Originally posted by JamesGreystone:
Ah I remember the days when WWW was just a myth, it was all text and newsgroups. You went to a store to make purchases. Now it's insane, making purchases from the Iphone, Web sites secure not secured. Sometime I miss the simpler days......
You and I both - Sometimes in SO many ways... including when a man's worth was judged by his actions and what was in his heart, verses now - when the only judgment seems to come from what he has in his pocketbook - regardless of how he has obtained it... POSITIVE MORALS EVERYONE!! ~ God Bless ALL ~ Rob |
01-29-2009, 05:11 PM | #102 |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
Works fine for me...
OS Name Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium Version 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001 Other OS Description Not Available OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation System Manufacturer TOSHIBA System Model EQUIUM P200 System Type X86-based PC Processor Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2080 @ 1.73GHz, 1733 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) BIOS Version/Date TOSHIBA V1.40, 26/04/2007 SMBIOS Version 2.4 Windows Directory C:\Windows System Directory C:\Windows\system32 Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume2 Locale United Kingdom Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "6.0.6001.18000" Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 1.00 GB Total Physical Memory 0.99 GB Available Physical Memory 280 MB Total Virtual Memory 2.23 GB Available Virtual Memory 890 MB Page File Space 1.28 GB |
01-30-2009, 01:39 AM | #103 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 31
|
Hi Jim,
The installer worked fine on my laptop with Vista. I hadn't put 2.6 or any of the beta versions on this machine, so it was a brand new install. It worked like a bought one! Many thanks, Lorraine |
01-30-2009, 08:18 AM | #104 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 41
|
No problem in Japanese Window XP, too.
|
01-30-2009, 09:33 AM | #105 |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 36
|
I just bought 3.0 for my sister inlaw no problems works great
windows xp pro s/p 3 radeon 9600 pro Last edited by troyb; 01-30-2009 at 02:11 PM. |
01-30-2009, 12:35 PM | #106 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
I would like to test the latest version of the installer. I'm willing to purchase the MA3 upgrade to do that, if it has a different (later) installer than Beta8K-with-installer.
Does the version supplied with the upgrade that I can buy from SereneScreen have a "later" installer than the one available for download at http://www.fish-byte.com/images/MarineAquarium3.exe -- or is it exactly the same thing? [I'm assuming that the $ simulator is identical to Beta8K] |
01-30-2009, 12:48 PM | #107 |
Developer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 9,791
|
Yes, the official version at SereneScreen.com is Beta8k, identical to the version at my site (which I'm removing - thanks for reminding me).
Jim Sachs
Creator of SereneScreen Aquarium |
01-30-2009, 01:18 PM | #108 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Hi gang
First of all thank you all for being so diligent in testing as well as helping me work out any issues with the installer. Yes I am the one responsible for it be it good or bad. Sorry for taking so long to get back to answering issues here...my Mother has been in CCU/ICU for the last week and was just removed from life support yesterday. Not because it's all over but because she is actually recovering, although slowly. I will go to the beginning of this thread and answer anything I can. Sorry if I repeat an answer that Jim or others may have already provided. I know for a fact (as I have done it myself many times building the installer) 1) Vista 64 has issues. Most are due to the way it was designed by MS. Vista will battle any "over-rides" we try unless we toggle security and elevate the user. I do not like that idea so there is an additional step required by the user. It is simple. 2) If you see any unexpected results it is usually because of a previous installation that is hiding or stuck in the registry. I will help everyone that has this problem seeing I have done it myself. In most cases the installer will clean all previous installations when uninstalled. 3) For anyone playing with Windows 7 Beta...it works great! Microsoft is listening to customer complaints about Vista in general and I for one will upgrade to Win 7 once released. Mark |
01-30-2009, 01:27 PM | #109 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
One more thing gang...a biggie
Depending on which beta version you have used ever, search your drive! 1) *.scr 2) *.lst The search mechanism in Windows is not what it once was so it may not be completely accurate. If you have unexpected results one of the old versions is lingering. The play list has been moved and all registry settings are based on the CURRENT scr name. Any questions just ask! Mark |
01-30-2009, 01:58 PM | #110 |
asdf
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hiko, CommieFagnia
Posts: 278
|
Thanks for the info, Mark. Glad yer Mother is doing better.
|
01-30-2009, 02:48 PM | #111 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Dale,
Please let me know if I miss any of your previous questions as I will cut to the chase.. The term "upgrade" may not have been the best and I agree is misleading. MA3 is NOT an "upgrade" to 2.6 it is a complete revision. A true upgrade would have a revision number such as 2.6.1 or 2.7 etc. MA3 is a standalone product with no ties to any previous version. MA3 will run along side of eariler versions and not disrupt them in any way. The term "upgrade" was used so that anyone falling into the category of free or lower-priced would lock on to the concept and do so. (Please remember, not everyone in the world is a intelligent as the group here. We had to appeal to the masses and help them understand) The only common factor is that it should install into the same program folder as anything else SereneScreen.
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 03:25 PM | #112 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Originally posted by cjmaddy:
Those looking for this version of MA3 in \Display Properties\Screen Saver, should note that it appears there as SereneScreen Marine Aquarium, NOT Marine Aquarium 3. - I think it would have been better had it been with the other MA savers, and called 'Marine Aquarium 3'.
If you see anything else either another version may exist
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 04:09 PM | #113 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Mark, - I have uninstalled then reinstalled Beta8k-with-installer, - I still have no Marine Aquarium 3 in the Display Properties Screen Saver list. Only older MA versions, together with a SereneScreen Marine Aquarium.
|
01-30-2009, 04:39 PM | #114 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belleville, Michigan
Posts: 68
|
C-
I had that problem, too. If you have Vista 64, it can be solved by right-clicking the MA3 desktop icon and selecting 'Install.' Did it for me, hopefully for you, too. edit: sorry. I may have misunderstood you. My screensaver list says Serenscreen Marine Aquarium, too. Not Marine Aquarium 3. |
01-30-2009, 04:41 PM | #115 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by markknight:
Dale,
Please let me know if I miss any of your previous questions as I will cut to the chase.. The term "upgrade" may not have been the best and I agree is misleading. MA3 is NOT an "upgrade" to 2.6 it is a complete revision. A true upgrade would have a revision number such as 2.6.1 or 2.7 etc. MA3 is a standalone product with no ties to any previous version. MA3 will run along side of eariler versions and not disrupt them in any way. The term "upgrade" was used so that anyone falling into the category of free or lower-priced would lock on to the concept and do so. (Please remember, not everyone in the world is a intelligent as the group here. We had to appeal to the masses and help them understand) The only common factor is that it should install into the same program folder as anything else SereneScreen. |
01-30-2009, 05:00 PM | #116 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Xylem,
This is strange. MarineAquarium3.scr is in my System32 folder, but not present in the Display Properties Screen Saver list. - Right-clicking/installing from the desktop icon, makes no difference. - In the Display Properties Screen Saver list MA3 is called SereneScreen Marine Aquarium I am using Win2kPro SP4, BTW. |
01-30-2009, 05:12 PM | #117 |
Prolific/SereneScreen Developer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 513
|
It sounds like Win2K is cutting off the name.
|
01-30-2009, 05:15 PM | #118 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Check back to Xylem's edit! .... Vista 64 is doing the same.
|
01-30-2009, 05:39 PM | #119 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: north of seattle
Posts: 6
|
MA3 is a standalone product with no ties to any previous version. MA3 will run along side of eariler versions and not disrupt them in any way.
He's right, I took ma2.5 and ma3 started them both and put them in the window and they ran well sitting next to each other. |
01-30-2009, 05:51 PM | #120 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
Yes. but it's taken an awfully long time, and endless repetition, to convince some that it was so!
|
|
|
|