01-30-2009, 06:02 PM | #121 |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 23
|
1. Thanks Jim for all the hard effort and detail you put in your work.
2. I purchased the upgrade key even though you offered for free to Beta testers because I want to make sure you know your work is well appreciated. 3. When I used the "PayPal" option on the serene screen checkout it stated that an account would be created for me. Was it referrring to an paypal account or prolific account? If it was prolific I saw no email about an account and there were no options to select an account name and password in the process. |
01-30-2009, 06:17 PM | #122 |
Developer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 9,787
|
jedware - Thanks for your support. I'll have to let Prolific answer your question about confirmation emails. I am positive that no PayPal account was created, because we have no way of doing that.
Jim Sachs
Creator of SereneScreen Aquarium |
01-30-2009, 06:33 PM | #123 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 31
|
jedware
I wondered about the account thing too. It took me to the Paypal page to create a Paypal account, but there was an option to sign into an existing account too. Cheers, Rainyfly |
01-30-2009, 06:35 PM | #124 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belleville, Michigan
Posts: 68
|
Well, I guess I've lost track of the issue here. To reiterate: In Vista 64 there is both a System32 file and a SysWOW64 file. There are Screensavers in both, but Serenescreen's appear in SysWOW64 (as they should). I have both MA2.6 and Marine Aquarium 3 in SysWOW64; they both run fine and don't interfere.
There is some oddity about the names: SysWOW64 contains "MarineAquarium3" but it appears in the Windows Screensaver window as "Serenscreen Marine Aquarium 3." The names must be controlled by some internal mechanism, but it makes not difference to the functioning of the screensaver. It does fine. It seems to me there is no problem; is that correct? edit: sorry, again. While I was typing that a bunch of replies got inserted. |
01-30-2009, 06:54 PM | #125 |
Developer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 9,787
|
Xylem - you are correct, the name that appears in the Display Properties screensaver list is extracted by Windows from internal data within the program, not from the filename. The version with the installer should show up as MarineAquarium3. The older Betas would be SereneScreen Marine Aqaurium.
Jim Sachs
Creator of SereneScreen Aquarium |
01-30-2009, 07:04 PM | #126 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belleville, Michigan
Posts: 68
|
LOL. OK, Jim, maybe I do have a problem.
I have the installer version installed (just to be sure; it self-launches as a SS, but to manually launch I have to type 'testfish', right?) Well it shows up in the Windows SS list as Serenescreen Marine Aquarium 3, which you say is an old beta. Do I have that right so far? Should it just say Marine Aquarium 3 in the SS list? |
01-30-2009, 07:19 PM | #127 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Originally posted by cjmaddy:
Mark, - I have uninstalled then reinstalled Beta8k-with-installer, - I still have no Marine Aquarium 3 in the Display Properties Screen Saver list. Only older MA versions, together with a SereneScreen Marine Aquarium.
For everyone, please be specific as there was a difference although I never posted it here... Marine Aquarium 3 and MarineAquarium3 are two VERY different animals that drop files in roughly the same locations BUT create two very different registry settings
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 07:29 PM | #128 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Originally posted by cjmaddy:
Xylem,
This is strange. MarineAquarium3.scr is in my System32 folder, but not present in the Display Properties Screen Saver list. - Right-clicking/installing from the desktop icon, makes no difference. - In the Display Properties Screen Saver list MA3 is called SereneScreen Marine Aquarium I am using Win2kPro SP4, BTW.
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 07:55 PM | #129 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Originally posted by Xylem:
Well, I guess I've lost track of the issue here. To reiterate: In Vista 64 there is both a System32 file and a SysWOW64 file. There are Screensavers in both, but Serenescreen's appear in SysWOW64 (as they should). I have both MA2.6 and Marine Aquarium 3 in SysWOW64; they both run fine and don't interfere.
There is some oddity about the names: SysWOW64 contains "MarineAquarium3" but it appears in the Windows Screensaver window as "Serenscreen Marine Aquarium 3." The names must be controlled by some internal mechanism, but it makes not difference to the functioning of the screensaver. It does fine. It seems to me there is no problem; is that correct? edit: sorry, again. While I was typing that a bunch of replies got inserted. Here is how it works: The physical scr is named MarineAquarium3, the user sees Marine Aquarium 3. This is by design Vista bumps names with spaces. 64 wont even load them and the install fails but to re-create this takes an installer. I am happy to listen to another way and welcome all ideas. What we have is pretty easy.
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 08:27 PM | #130 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by Jim Sachs:
jedware - Thanks for your support. I'll have to let Prolific answer your question about confirmation emails. I am positive that no PayPal account was created, because we have no way of doing that.
I figured I could always back out, so I just plugged on ahead, and was presented with a screen that let me enter my PayPal ID and password - and then pay using that account. So, the first statement is a BIT misleading, and should probably be fixed to be more clear about what is going to happen if one chooses PayPal as the payment method. I'll also comment that the PayPal screens were legitimate, but were not exactly like any other PayPal screens I had ever seen (and I've seen several payment menthods using PayPal). For instance (and proof) my browser did not automatically fill in my PayPal ID in the login panel - and it "always" does that on other sites. No big deals, but I thought they deserved mentioning. |
01-30-2009, 08:40 PM | #131 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by cjmaddy:
Yes. but it's taken an awfully long time, and endless repetition, to convince some that it was so!
And markknight already (unnecessarily) apologized for the less-than-48-hours delay in answering. So, browbeat me if you wish, but not Mark. |
01-30-2009, 08:48 PM | #132 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Dale,
PayPal is a third party payment method that we must have. I prefer to use PayPal just for the security in most of my personal transactions Once anyone decides on that option, you are in their world not ours. Its is a HTTPS / SSL. We forward to them and hand off everything from that point on. If you have no account you need to make one. Them not us. Eventually we get paid
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 09:01 PM | #133 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Dale,
No one here has any intention of browbeating anyone. I love a challenge. I WANT to hear what went wrong from YOU and everyone here! Once this goes completely live /non-beta for the world to see...can you imagine just how many problems I could create by ONE wrong keystroke!? Call me find me yell at me, help me cut the support questions to a minimum. Jim built the BEST screen saver ever made. It is my duty to make an installer that is "KISS".....Keep It Simple Stupid. If I have failed in that task. you better speak up! Mark@Prolific.com mark_knight_prolific Skype 818-562-8400 x393
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-30-2009, 10:41 PM | #134 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by markknight:
Dale,
PayPal is a third party payment method that we must have. I prefer to use PayPal just for the security in most of my personal transactions Once anyone decides on that option, you are in their world not ours. Its is a HTTPS / SSL. We forward to them and hand off everything from that point on. If you have no account you need to make one. Them not us. Eventually we get paid My comment was meant to convey that as I recall, the Prolific panel only referred to creating an account. I don't recall seeing anything that said I could use my existing PayPal account. That was a bit bothersome to me ("hmmm - perhaps I can't use my existing account"). But I plugged along, and quickly found out that I could use my existing account. It looked like Rainyfly and jedware had the same experience and "bother" (see their comments earlier). Now, perhaps my recollection is wrong - and I sure can't easily go back and repeat the experience. But, if I remembered correctly, I suggest changing the wording to indicate that you can use your existing PayPal account and, if you don't have one, PayPal will create one for you. |
01-30-2009, 11:11 PM | #135 |
Prolific Team
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, Ca
Posts: 21
|
Dale
How can we make this better? Stupid proof? If you as a regular user of PayPal just "felt wrong" please, help me make it better. This is not my territory but I have the ability to make it better. Of note...PayPal will not allow us to run tests. All transactions are real and live
Mark Knight
MIS Specialist |
01-31-2009, 02:55 PM | #136 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by markknight:
Dale
How can we make this better? Stupid proof? If you as a regular user of PayPal just "felt wrong" please, help me make it better. This is not my territory but I have the ability to make it better. Of note...PayPal will not allow us to run tests. All transactions are real and live On the panel: https://www.prolific.com/store/cart.php?mode=checkout Where it says: "New Customers: Want to use PayPal? Click the above button and let Paypal create your account." Remove the "New Customers" part, and then... Make it say something like: "Want to use PayPal? Click the above button to use your existing PayPal Account or let Paypal create your new account." [Underlines used above just to show where the changes are] |
01-31-2009, 03:04 PM | #137 |
Developer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 9,787
|
Thanks, the wording will be changed.
Jim Sachs
Creator of SereneScreen Aquarium |
01-31-2009, 10:17 PM | #138 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by Rob62:
As far as "getting picky". During the installation, regarding the suggestion pertaining to having the latest DirectX (in this case 9.0c or greater) installed, the link below that statement brings one to a Microsoft home page that requires navigation to the DirectX page from there. Why not send folks directly to: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/B...n&categoryid=2 ?
The bottom line would be that, the easier you make it for "joe user" to find out if he/she has the right prerequisites, and THEN the easier you make it for him/her to find and install the latest version, the fewer support problems you will have. There are lots of alternatives for "where to send them". |
01-31-2009, 10:28 PM | #139 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
I just ran the installer and have several comments/suggestions to make. Thankfully, I don't have time to write all of them now.
I'll start with the first thing I saw. When the user tries to run the installer, Microsoft pops up a window announcing that it can't identify the publisher and suggesting that perhaps the user shouldn't continue. The big problem is that publisher is shown as "Unknown Publisher". Presuming that Prolific is proud of the product, a certificate is needed to identify the publisher. [Yes, I know that "most folks" will just click on the "quit bothering me with security" button and go on - but I recommend against beginning the user experience with "sloppy"] |
02-01-2009, 10:25 AM | #140 |
Retired
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton Alberta Ca
Posts: 2,441
|
Originally posted by Jim Sachs:
We are getting very close to releasing Marine Aquarium 3 to the public. We have produced an Installer for Marine Aquarium 3 Beta 8k which we would like everyone to take a look at and test out. Note that it will NOT accept any 2.6 keycodes and we are no generating Marine Aquarium 3 keycodes at this time. So to test it out, please use the TESTFISH key. Download Marine Aquarium 3 Beta 8k with Installer I covered this in another thread, but yes - MA3 will need its own Key Code. Anyone who paid full price for MA2.6 on the website since last August will be able to simply log onto the site and get a free MA3 Key by email. Anyone participating in this Beta Test Forum will be able to get one, though Customer Service will need to handle that. And of course, you few who have been with us for the better part of a decade will be entitled to a free upgrade. None of the mechanisms for getting the new Key Codes are in place yet. This new download is for those who'd like to test the new installer and behavior of MA3 in its unregistered form. For a while, the version at the normal download location (which has no installer) will continue to accept MA2.6 Key Codes. |
|
|
|