06-08-2010, 11:27 AM | #1 |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
|
Beta 11j discussion
Frame rate is much better, Jim
- 19-inch CRT Monitor - Intel P4, 3.2 GHz, 4GB memory - Windows XP Professional (32-bit) - ATI Radeon HD3650, 512MB (AGP 8x) - Full Screen Mode - 23 fish in tank - Bubble Column = ON - Music = OFF ------------------------------- Beta 11i with “limit frame rate” OFF 111.14 (1280x1024x32) #0 Beta 11i HAL (pure hw vp): ATI Radeon HD3600 Series Sleep(10) Window Size 1280x1024 ---------------------------------------------- Beta 11i with “limit frame rate” ON (62) 58.75-62.42 (1280x1024x32) #0 Beta 11i HAL (pure hw vp): ATI Radeon HD3600 Series Sleep(17-18) Window Size 1280x1024 ---------------------------------------------- Beta 11j with “limit frame rate” ON (62) 61.99-62.01 (1280x1024x32) #0 Beta 11j HAL (pure hw vp): ATI Radeon HD3600 Series Window Size 1280x1024 CPU Usage: Thread #1: 20-30% Thread #2: 10-20% Last edited by harris; 06-08-2010 at 02:16 PM. Reason: Added CPU Usage |
06-08-2010, 11:49 AM | #2 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
|
Corrupt zip file
Sorry I seem to be having problems with the ZIP file I have tried downloading it from a couple of different browsers and the ZIP file looks corrupt.
|
06-08-2010, 11:58 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by nicwatters:
Sorry I seem to be having problems with the ZIP file I have tried downloading it from a couple of different browsers and the ZIP file looks corrupt.
|
06-08-2010, 12:03 PM | #4 |
Sugar Plum Fairy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,267
|
7-Zip worked, although not from a right click. I had to open the main program and extract from there.
Run you clever boy. And remember...
|
06-08-2010, 01:00 PM | #5 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
Won't extract properly for me, either.
I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Last edited by JohnWho; 06-08-2010 at 01:01 PM. Reason: Corrupt file? |
06-08-2010, 01:13 PM | #6 |
Retired
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton Alberta Ca
Posts: 2,443
|
Windows XP at work will not extract it either
|
06-08-2010, 01:21 PM | #7 |
asdf
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hiko, CommieFagnia
Posts: 278
|
Weird file. Did get it to extract by downloading trial ver of winzip (v14.5).
But I use winrar (normally) for 100% of archive work. |
06-08-2010, 01:22 PM | #8 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
Originally posted by henemly:
Weird file. Did get it to extract by downloading trial ver of winzip (v14.5).
Unzipped OK with that. I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 01:23 PM | #9 |
Sugar Plum Fairy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,267
|
Observations.
11i frame limit set to 50 was providing frame rates from 49.2 to 50.4 11j same limit. Frame rates generally holding between 49.9 and 50.2. Ocassional very brief dips to 47 or 48fps. Maybe every 10 seconds or so. P.S. Nobody thought to try 7-Zip? It's freeware. It works. I said so like an hour ago.
Run you clever boy. And remember...
Last edited by Nicki; 06-08-2010 at 02:54 PM. |
06-08-2010, 01:30 PM | #10 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
OK, when I first launch 11j I am seeing the Statistics display.
I shows: 0.00 fps (1680x1050x32) #0 Beta 11j on the top line. No longer shows "Sleep" setting info on 3rd line. Obviously, the 0.00 frame rate is not correct since the fish are "swimming" happily, it's panning, and the stuff that's supposed to be moving is. If I then choose a Frame Rate - 60 - the display shows a slightly varying FPS of between 59.94 to 60.04. Turning "Limit Frame Rate" off appears to "lock in" the last used FPS. Is all of this the way it is supposed to be, Jim? I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 01:36 PM | #11 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
Originally posted by Nicki:
P.S. Nobody thought to try 7-Zip? It's freeware. It works. I said so like an hour ago.
Did not realize that it is a "time limited" version until I installed it. Will try 7-Zip next time if the Windows 7 built-in unzip doesn't handle a "zipped" file. Thanks for the info, Nicki. I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 01:40 PM | #12 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
I see that in the "Program Settings" panel -
"Bubble Column" and "Bubble Sound" are now together. Anything else we should be looking for, Jim? I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 01:48 PM | #13 |
Sugar Plum Fairy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,267
|
Geeze, I sounded uncharacteristically grumpy there JohnWho, didn't I? Just trying to help save some time .
I can duplicate what you have reported, but it wasn't doing that before. Maybe running 11i after 11j has something to do with it. I'll try a registry purge.
Run you clever boy. And remember...
|
06-08-2010, 01:55 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 960
|
Originally posted by Nicki:
P.S. Nobody thought to try 7-Zip? It's freeware. It works. I said so like an hour ago.
We don't need to be spending time trying to test stuff that hasn't changed. That's a waste of our time, and Jim's time. |
06-08-2010, 02:07 PM | #15 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
Originally posted by henemly:
The crystal analog numbers look centered better now, but the hands might be
where they were before. Minute hand overlap in downward positions. (looking straight on, static - same position for all five images) I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 02:33 PM | #16 |
Sugar Plum Fairy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,267
|
Originally posted by JohnWho:
OK, when I first launch 11j I am seeing the Statistics display.
I shows: 0.00 fps (1680x1050x32) #0 Beta 11j on the top line. No longer shows "Sleep" setting info on 3rd line. Obviously, the 0.00 frame rate is not correct since the fish are "swimming" happily, it's panning, and the stuff that's supposed to be moving is. If I then choose a Frame Rate - 60 - the display shows a slightly varying FPS of between 59.94 to 60.04. Turning "Limit Frame Rate" off appears to "lock in" the last used FPS. Is all of this the way it is supposed to be, Jim?
Run you clever boy. And remember...
|
06-08-2010, 02:35 PM | #17 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
Nicki -
so, with "Limit Frame Rate" not on, when you first open MA and the Stats display shows 0.00 fps, what are you actually getting with fraps as the "default"? I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
06-08-2010, 02:52 PM | #18 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
|
With 7-Zip, I now have it working. (Thanks, Nicki)
Like others have said, 11j set for 60fps, now generates a more steady 60ish fps, and produces a more steady but slightly higher CPU usage.... Fine! But.... the Etched Analog Clock is now noticeably off centre..... It doesn't look good. |
06-08-2010, 02:53 PM | #19 |
Sugar Plum Fairy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,267
|
While the frame rate is reading 0.00 in the stats display, fraps tells me I'm getting anywhere from 57fps to about 74 fps. Which is about what I would get before using a sleep of 10. I'm using all program defaults right now. 6 more fish than I usually have, so my earlier post is innacurate and needs to be edited.
Run you clever boy. And remember...
|
06-08-2010, 03:03 PM | #20 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 486
|
We need some input from Jim.
Perhaps the "default" FPS, when showing 0.00, is what we were all getting with a "Sleep of 10". If so, I'm at about 111 fps. Guess we should wait until we get "11k", which would fix the Stats display? I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
|
|
|
|